Ukraine conflict “was essential for me as an architect” says Anhelina Starkova
This site contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.
Anhelina L Starkova explains how her expertise of residing by means of the Ukraine conflict has formed her method to curating the 2024 Tallinn Structure Biennale on this interview.
Starkova, who was chief curator of this 12 months’s biennale, is from Kharkiv in north-east Ukraine – a metropolis that has suffered heavy bombardment since Russia launched its invasion in February 2022, coming near being captured early on within the battle.
Based on the curator, she skilled one thing near an epiphany not lengthy after the conflict started, whereas taking refuge within the bunker in her home as bombs fell round it
“I do not forget that planes had been flying round, and the constructing was shaking, and it was actually the second whenever you perceive that it is in all probability your final minutes,” she recalled.
“I used to be standing with this wall, and I used to be considering that this wall was a continuation of my physique – that is me,” she continued.
“It was, for an architect, [a] very fascinating feeling. As a result of I completed college, I had my 10 years in follow, and I nonetheless was probably not immersed in structure.”
“You all the time assume it intellectually, however after I was on this bunker I began [to] assume, ‘oh my god, that is the one one factor that may actually save me – this wall is the one one factor that I want’. It was a really existential expertise.”
Later, whereas spending a while in Bucharest, visiting a shopping center made her rethink the worth of structure.
“There’s all this business structure, and I really feel such a disgust,” she advised Dezeen. “Prefer it’s a cartoon, it is not actual. I felt it not with my mind however with all my physique: we stay in a world of full phantasm.”
In different phrases, Starkova stated, the traumatic expertise of the conflict has given her a brand new sense of readability about what actually issues in structure.
“When the conflict began within the Ukraine, that was essential for me as an architect,” she defined. “I did not count on that it could affect me a lot personally.”
“All the pieces type of began to be very clear: many, many issues that we add to structure – these addictive visions – are further issues, and they don’t seem to be making buildings in a complete approach.”
“If I want to proceed [in architecture] then I would wish to isolate myself from all this gallery of considering, which I am unable to stand anymore.”
As a substitute, Starkova, who in addition to operating her personal studio lectures on the College of Utilized Sciences of the Grisons and Kharkiv College of Structure, has develop into extra within the naked necessities of structure.
“Actually nice structure, it is about sturdiness elements, the performance, but additionally giving individuals a type of stability and security,” she stated. “Ultimately, it is principally about our immersion.”
Starkova has utilized this back-to-basics philosophy to her curation of the seventh Tallinn Structure Biennale, which opened within the Estonian capital final week.
On the centre of this 12 months’s biennale is an exhibition exploring the theme of Assets for a Future, hosted by the Estonian Centre for Structure.
That includes 14 displays from studios together with Gus Wüstemann Architects, KAMP Arhitektid, Déchelette Structure and Pihlmann Architects, it examines completely different approaches to utilizing native assets for creating new buildings and prolonging the lifetime of current ones.
“I had conversations with every architect that you need to have a look at the fundamentals and the elemental, actual really feel of what you’re doing,” Starkova stated.
“And even requested every architect, whenever you’re speaking about assets, what actually fosters you to do structure, what helps you? And every set up confirmed the solutions.”
For example, Denmark-based Pihlmann Architects created a big mannequin of a stripped-back constructing shell the place a part of every flooring had been lower out and sloped downwards to kind a ramp up from the ground under.
“It was actually about this concept of purification,” stated Starkova. “You see an previous constructing and also you simply don’t add something. You see the character of the constructing and also you’re making an attempt to heal it or to reformulate its parts.”
That, she stated, is a lesson she discovered whereas engaged on repairs to broken buildings in Kharkiv throughout the conflict.
“You are making an attempt to compose it once more, to heal it, after which it will get one other conceptual atmosphere – one other feeling, and it is already structure.”
“Structure is the fixed strategy of considering of your relation to supplies, completely different parts, and assemblage of them in a holistic approach.”
On the centre of the exhibition are a collection of pillars erected by rammed-earth specialist Emmanuelle Déchelette of Paris studio Déchelette Structure, with the fabric dug regionally to Tallinn.
“It is about doing quite a bit with nothing, that full purification,” stated Starkova. “To keep away from this ideological and even social structure.”
The taking part architects got a intentionally open temporary, as a result of Starkova felt the exhibition was “not about dogmas”. Because of this, the displays are extremely different in kind and method.
They vary from an enormous chunk of a restored conventional Estonian log home by Apex Arhitektuuribüroo (pictured high) to an summary proposal for a public area created solely by digging by Romanian architect Laura Cristea and Swiss architect Raphael Zuber.
In one other, Estonian studio KAMP Arhitektid offered analysis on the shocking breadth of potential constructing supplies that may be discovered on one particular 15 square-kilometre piece of land within the nation.
“Every challenge was a shock as a result of I did not know them personally earlier than the exhibition, none of them,” stated Starkova.
That impact was solely heightened by the truth that Starkova managed the entire challenge remotely, solely arriving in Tallinn a couple of days earlier than the exhibition opened.
She started with an inventory of greater than 500 architects whose work she admires, ultimately choosing those that she felt “had been essentially the most radical of their considering”.
The Ukraine conflict is referenced in a single set up, produced by Elina Liiva and Helena Manna in collaboration with PAKK, composed of a collection of photographs of condo residing rooms printed on translucent material and positioned in a line, with chunk of concrete mendacity close by that corresponds with a gap lower into the scene.
However past that, Starkova intentionally prevented making the battle a direct focus of the exhibition, believing that it could detract from a way of immediacy.
“In the course of the conflict, it is not a spot for structure – principally a spot for considering,” she stated.
“And sure, architects are attempting to assume, with the assist of worldwide world structure, what may very well be performed [after the war]. However I simply needed to remain sincere and never be futuristic.”
General, Starkova hopes the exhibition will allow guests “to study from architects that structure is easy to do, and that the formulation are fairly easy”.
In addition to main curation of the exhibition, Starkova was additionally head choose for the biennale’s customary pavilion fee competitors, this time for a bus shelter at Tallinn’s Balti Jaam transit hub.
Out of greater than 80 entries, the winner was No Time to Waste by Belgian structure duo Brasebin Terrisse.
The central idea of the pavilion, which remains to be finishing building, was that the design could be led by no matter building off-cut supplies may very well be sourced in Tallinn.
“This was the one challenge who stated that we’ve an open finish – we don’t suggest [a] type of the set up, we put together that we come to Tallinn, we check a neighborhood scenario and after we’ll develop a kind given when doing the work on it,” stated Starkova.
“So the rendering of the challenge itself is only a library of expertise that they want to use, however the kind should be made later throughout the working course of,” she added. “It adopted the course of the biennale.”
With the biennale’s opening-week programme full, Starkova has now returned to Kharkiv, the place many buildings lie in ruins in a metropolis that was beforehand celebrated for its wealthy and different architectural heritage.
“It is all so troublesome,” she mirrored. “Kharkiv is altering, it’s in fixed change.”
“It is completely not possible to stay, since you stay in that mode of all the time existential disaster – on the sting, all the time. You go to mattress, you do not know you are going to get up. You go exterior, you do not know you are coming again.”
“Perhaps it brings some magnificence, as a result of we really stay on this approach, all of us – proper on the sting.”
The images is by Tõnu Tunnel except said in any other case.
Assets For A Future will run till 1 December 2024 on the Museum of Estonian Structure, Ahtri tn 2, 10151 Tallinn, Estonia. See Dezeen Occasions Information for an up-to-date checklist of structure and design occasions happening around the globe.
